[Today’s post at Tsunami Lessons, our companion blog, is duplicated here at CHORE this morning.]
* * * * *
"One goal of the improved instruments is to avoid having too many warnings, which erodes confidence in the system, McCreery said. 'The gap is really trying to keep the public prepared to do the right thing when the situation occurs.'"
That paragraph is the final one in a Honolulu Star-Bulletin story today on new instruments installed at the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. The irony should be obvious to anyone familiar with the complete absence of a useful warning after the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. (New visitors to Tsunami Lessons might want to start reading on this subject at our first post on January 2, 2005, "No Tsunami Warning -- Why?")
Tomorrow's second part of this two-part series is titled "Getting the public to respond to tsunamis" -- potentially another irony-laden angle in light of the 2004 tsunami warning failure.
Our observations are long overdue here on improvements made in NOAA's standard operating procedures to disseminate tsunami warnings using the news media -- the #1 subject we've flogged for the past two years. Enough has been written about these improvements in the past few months to conclude that NOAA has indeed restructured its early-warning procedures to engage the news media earlier than ever.
For now, we'll wait for more news during Tsunami Awareness Month to see how the PTWC actually will use its new technology to accomplish its mission -- which is to warn.
* * * * *
5-Month “Gap” in Gap Reporting
The Honolulu Advertiser today carries a page 1 story that essentially repeats revelations made by the Star-Bulletin on October 29th – that nearly 150 “gap areas” around the islands aren’t covered by the emergency siren network.
Back then, officials wouldn’t disclose which communities are in the gaps, but that lapse in judgment was swept away by the Bulletin’s public records request, as noted in CHORE’s January 14th post.
Conclusion: Tsunami Awareness Month has begun with a media blitz that focuses attention on needed improvements in Hawaii’s emergency communications capabilities. And that’s no joke.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MISSION: To Ensure the Lahaina Fire Tragedy Will Be the Last Time Hawaii Emergency Management so Poorly Serves the Public
The cause of the August 2023 wildfire that destroyed Lahaina, Maui and killed at least 101 residents is still unknown at this writing. What ...
The mere mention of public response, or lack of it, rubs me the wrong way. Of course there will always be people without the sense to react appropriately to emergencies. That's not the point. The important thing here is do we get a signal from Civil Defense that there is something potentially dangerous, and are we then given information (via emergency radio, sms, or whatever) that helps us decide on appropriate action. Obviously Pacific Tsunami Warning Center/Civil Defense can't control the people. What they can control are their own systems and procedures so that they provide important information in a timely manner.
ReplyDelete