Skip to main content

Have Crisis Managers Forgotten Radio? Redding’s Emergency Preparedness Page Mentions Radio Only in Passing re Alerts about Threats and Evacuations

The Sunday July 29, 2018 Sacramento Bee reported that the Bledsoe family, which lost a great-grandmother and two great-grandchildren in the Carr fire that’s been raging in Northern California, had no idea an evacuation had been ordered. 

Is there no organized communications effort among all responding agencies in these crisis situations directing people to tune to one designated emergency radio station? Even flip phone owners presumably have access to radio. A multi-channel communications effort to direct people to listen for fast-changing alerts and evacuation orders on ONE RADIO STATION appears to not even exist. There isn’t a station owner or manager alive who’d refuse an official request to become the go-to station in a crisis.

Regarding the above headline: The City of Redding’s Emergency Preparedness website — — mentions radio only in passing as a reliable communications channel during life-threatening emergencies. Here’s the site’s advice: “Learn about your community's warning signals: what they sound like and what you should do when your hear them.” But it has nothing like this: “Station (XYZ) is the designated emergency broadcast station in this region. Tune to (station’s frequency) to stay informed about threats to your safety.”

If electricity is cut to a siren or the site’s battery is dead, that warning signal won’t happen. It’s as if all of crisis response has fallen in love with “signals” and social media and texting and “push messages,” leaving the broadest form of communication in yesterday’s dustbin. This is bad public policy! Don’t authorities have a plan to use radio — the most reliable and accessible communications tool — in a crisis?

Another issue: The Bledsoe family’s tragedy is especially hard to understand since one of the aunties told the Bee she could see from the checkpoint that halted her effort to save her relatives that the family’s house hadn’t yet burned. She was stopped by authorities from rescuing the great-grandmother and the kids. What’s the protocol when someone tells authorities “...but they’re RIGHT THERE! I CAN SEE THE HOUSE!!” Nobody goes? Nobody in authority goes? They stand their ground but don’t otherwise respond to this kind of incoming intelligence?

Emergency planners aren’t immune from scrutiny. It’s how mistakes are avoided in the next crisis. The Sonoma County fires last fall resulted in many post-action assessments of what went right and wrong. One of the first corrections that needs to happen NOW is incorporating old-fashioned-but-reliable AM radio into the emergency communications protocol. Relying on text messages and all the high-tech channels may be trendy, but it’s costing lives. Not including radio in emergency notification borders on the irresponsible.


Popular posts from this blog

This is Your CHORE if You Choose to Accept It

CHORE stands for the title of this new blog: Citizens Helping Officials Respond to Emergencies.

Specifically, the focus is helping officials in Hawaii respond to emergencies such as the one we just had -- the two earthquakes (6.7 and 6.0 on the scale) that struck the islands on Sunday, October 15, 2006.

"Help" is the operable concept. I get the feeling -- based on news coverage of officialdom's emergency response -- that some good old-fashioned idea mongering and suggestions might help improve communications to our population during and after emergencies.

You be the judge after reading this report in The Honolulu Advertiser today, headlined: "Debate begins on delay of news"

My reaction to that story is that our Civil Defense officials, elected government leaders and broadcast media need to communicate more, not less. Comments by officials in this story suggest a mindset to not tell the population too much for fear the messages might be misunderstood.

My thoughts …

Perry and Price Are Right: They Really COULD Do Their Brand of Emergency Broadcasting from Albania

Hawaii News Now reports "live" from the Big Island; 
1500 AM on Oahu delivered the goods on Iselle with the HNN simulcast.
Honolulu’s designated emergency broadcaster, KSSK, did what it said it would do – move its market-leading broadcast personalities to Las Vegas the day before Hurricane Iselle was expected to hit the islands. You can read about that decision here.
In so many respects, KSSK’s emergency broadcast role in August 2014 mirrors how the station performed after the October 2006 Big Island earthquakes (here, and here), how it performed after the December 2008 island-wide power outage and on other occasions, most of which are chronicled at CHORE (such as here, here,here and here).
In a nutshell, there’s nothing in KSSK’s approach to emergency broadcasting to suggest it knows how to respect the emergency. And here’s the proof:
KSSK’s 7:30 a.m. Newscast on August 8, 2014 – about five hours after Hurricane Iselle arrived on the Big Island.
Story Lineup * Iraq ISIS attacks s…

KSSK: Power Outages Reportedly Weren’t Widespread Enough To Mention in the News

We now have additional information about KSSK’s lack of power outage coverage early this morning. CHORE questioned the station's performance today for not mentioning any power outages in its early newscasts, even though outages had been common during the thunderstorms and, according to a Hawaiian Electric recording at its Trouble number (548-7961), they were still happening.

HECO’s message at 4:20 a.m. mentioned 18 communities where outages had been reported. (The list had grown to 26 communities by early this afternoon.) We had no reason to doubt the list’s accuracy; on the contrary, we had reason enough to believe outages were indeed happening in those 18 communities -- from Niu Valley to Mililani Mauka. The reason we called HECO in the first place was that power was out at our home and our entire community of dozens (hundreds?) of other homes.

Except for this: Chuck Cotton, vice president/general manager of Clear Channel Radio Hawaii, told CHORE the following in an email:

“A H…